I don't think anybody has said "why would you do that" or otherwise "tsk, tsk"d the original poster. There is one reply that discusses the pollutiveness of the tanning process, but this is simply information-sharing. I see nothing wrong with it. Are we here to share information or not?Smackoww said:sorry for the following vent, but its just been bothering me.
this is not the first time someone has responded to a message with "Why would you do that?! its not eco friendly!". please answer his question. dont belittle him for wanting leather. he specifically asked if it came with leather. not 'should i get leather? i havent decided because of the environmental issues'.
ive also seen this in the radar detector thread. but i think ive made my point, so i dont have to go into detail.
'tsk tsk' for a 'tsk tsk' for a 'tsk tsk'Smackoww said:i just had the feeling that the 'tsk tsk' post was lecturingthe origional poster. not answering his question. the majority of the post was booing leather because of the environmental concern, thoguh i do agree this wasnt s bad.
im more bothered by the radar detector post in another thread (if youve read it, you know what im talking about). the discussion then got hijacked into a debate on whether speeding was moral!
Uhmm. If I wanted the leather then thats my problem, not yours, so why should you hope not?mrv said:I certainly hope that leather is not an option! (So far, it isn't.)