High mile Prius reliability - Page 2 - Toyota Prius Forum : Prius Online Toyota Forums
User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-04-2005, 10:32 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomme
Quote:
Originally Posted by RSnyder
117K miles, 5 years.
Out of pocket: replaced accelerator pedal at 80K, replaced front wheel bearings at 90K.

Hybrid system still going great.
So you would argue AGAINST the extended warranty, then?
Not based on one data point, certainly.

Like any other extended warranty, you will on average make out better by not getting it, but if you happen to be unlucky, you could make out MUCH worse. Many people like the security of a known higher than average cost as opposed to an unknown cost that will probably be less but could be high enough that you can't afford it. If you lose your transportation due to bad luck, it could snowball disasterously (lose job, etc.). So unless you can cover the occasional big loss, I still think the extended warranty is prudent.
RSnyder is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-14-2005, 10:59 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default Gas mileage

I've owned a Prius for a year and a half.
Last tank was almost 48 mpg........still an amazing car
gwharp is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-15-2005, 04:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RSnyder
Like any other extended warranty, you will on average make out better by not getting it, but if you happen to be unlucky, you could make out MUCH worse. Many people like the security of a known higher than average cost as opposed to an unknown cost that will probably be less but could be high enough that you can't afford it. If you lose your transportation due to bad luck, it could snowball disasterously (lose job, etc.). So unless you can cover the occasional big loss, I still think the extended warranty is prudent.
But if you own several cars over your lifetime, like most of us do, then you are better off never getting one. Now my Prius is still under Toyota warranty, but let's say it isn't and I have a failure of some part that will run me $1,500. Now my dealer offered the extended warranty for $750 and one for $1,100 (could have teh numbers wrong, I barely paid attention), but others have posted getting it for I think $500. So you say, jeez Spike, if you had bought the extended warranty for $500, you would have saved $1,000. A thousand bucks is not chump change certainly. And on the surface, that would seem to make sense. And many people would never buy a car without the extended warranty again. But you miss a crucial fact, the Prius is not my first new car and I skipped the extended warranty on all of them. So, if, and it is a big if, I could have gotten the extended warranty on all of them for $500 each, on 6 cars that is $3,000. On none of the others did I ever have a repair that would have been covered by any extended warranty I ever loooked at. So in this scenario, I saved $1,500 overall by not spending $3,000 on an extended warranties over the years. Never mind the fact that some of those were bought pre-internet, so I would have paid more for the extended warranty. But more importantly, most people finance that extended warranty so you have paid 3-7 years worth of interest on that money. Cha-Ching Cha-Ching. You would have been far better off taking that extra money every month and putting it a savings account, earning minimal interest. You would then have the money, plus some extra to cover the rare repair & transportation if you are far from home. But most of us, do most of our driving close to home, so that cost shouldn't be a big concern. And if you are going to lose your job over car trouble, than your life is in really tough shape.
The reason extended warrantties are so popular with dealers, is the HUGE $$ they make off them.
OK, for the early adaptors the Prius was an unknown to a certain extent. So I will understand the first people wanting that coverage, heck I bought in 04 and I actually thought about it. But for most car purchases, with Honda or Toyota, there is simply no need for the extended coverage.
I tend to very conservative with my money, and am big on the "better safe than sorry" slogan, but extended warranty coverage is total and utter BUNK.

Spike
Spike is offline  
 
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-15-2005, 08:22 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default Extended Warranty

I have the same philosophy as Spike. Over time, I've probably saved $10,000 on not getting extended warranties that probably would have covered, maybe, $1,000 worth of repairs.

However, I can see two situations where an extended warranty might be justified:

o For those that don't have or can't maintain sufficient emergency funds to cover an unexpected large repair.

o If you can't resist purchasing a vehicle that has a very bad reliability/repair history (although I've found that the extended warranty on such vehicles is very, very expensive - makes sense, huh).
Tomel is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-15-2005, 08:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,878
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default

You're forgetting one point. The Prius is not a standard "reliable" Toyota but an entirely new concept of transportation on four wheels almost completely controlled by computers. The dealers in the country who are expected to keep this "noble experiment" running have after several years been shown lacking in interest and experiance. I'm no computer expert but how many computers you use constantly have kept running without a problem or re-booting, or requiring service for "three years, six years or seven years.
I'm not sure about you but I wouldn't have come within ten feet of a Prius without the offer of an extended warranty.
Regardless of how you feel, we are all part of Toyotas "experiment" with a very complicated hybrid mode of power.
This is NO Corolla! Most bets on Japanese reliability are out the window on this car and any extended purchased for less than a thousand dollars may be the best option offered on this car. It certainly would be my first choice and in 60 yrs of car ownership this will be my first warranty purchased.



hyperion is offline  
post #16 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-15-2005, 10:05 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Default I can tell you when it goes SOUTH

2001 with 107K miles in the shop for a $4000 battery. We will probably junk the car.
Between a $1500 computer and a dead battery, can't afford to save gas anymore
walkinghat is offline  
post #17 of 17 (permalink) Old 12-15-2005, 10:18 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Default

FISHY TROLL ALERT!!! How far will the phucker go?????
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



  Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Actual experiences with classic Prius reliability? bobwilson1977 Toyota Prius General Discussion 6 04-19-2008 12:26 AM
2001 Prius - Reliability Adam1979 Toyota Prius Technical - Q & A 8 05-01-2006 08:50 PM
04 Reliability mitymurph Toyota Prius General Discussion 3 02-01-2006 10:10 PM
Tire Reliability on 2004 Prius thefurg Toyota Prius - Technical Chat 5 07-19-2004 10:40 AM
2001 Prius reliability problems Toyota Prius - Technical Chat 12 05-17-2003 12:49 AM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome